07
Plastics
A once in a generation chance to halt the insidious march of plastic.
Next week, in a nondescript port city in South Korea, delegates from around the world will gather for the most consequential negotiating session you’ve likely never heard of.
by Dr Andrew Forrest AO PhD, Founder of Minderoo Foundation
This isn’t the G20, nor a meeting to curb nuclear weapons or address the threats of infectious disease. It isn’t COP29, where I was last week calling for Real Zero – an end to the use of fossil fuels.
But it’s just as important.
It is the final round of negotiations for what could be a groundbreaking treaty to end the incessant production of virgin plastic and curb the devastating impact that plastic chemicals are having on human health.
It is now a scientific fact that plastic chemicals are making us fatter, sicker and less fertile.
If the world does nothing, if the negotiators just tinker around the edges, we are locking ourselves into a future where we and our kids get sicker and sicker from the plastic chemicals that are building up in our food, our water and our bodies.
Credit: Muhammad Numan via Unsplash
Unsurprisingly, some fossil fuel companies and countries are actively lobbying for a weak treaty – because they’re profiting from plastics.
At the most recent round of plastic treaty negotiations in Ottawa, one in 20 of the more than 4000 delegates was a fossil fuel executive, lobbying for your children to continue to be harmed by toxic chemicals.
These lobbyists and countries with a vested interest will tell you recycling is the solution. That the onus is on you, the consumer, to recycle more. What they conveniently neglect to mention is that recycled plastic can be more hazardous than virgin plastic.
The solution is a Global Plastics Treaty that imposes a small price per tonne of plastic on producers of the building blocks of plastic.
It’s a small cost to these multinational chemical companies which can then be used to build waste management systems, assist waste workers to transition to new jobs, clean up past pollution and fund critical human health research to build understanding of the harm from plastic chemicals.
Credit: Seunghyeok Choi (Break Free From Plastic and Uproot Plastic Coalition)
The need for a Polymer Premium is backed by OECD research which found that to avoid a plastic health and environment crisis the world needs more than just downstream measures. We must address the problem at its source.
It’s rare to have the opportunity to comprehensively right a wrong inflicted on the planet and us.
The negotiators in Korea have a choice to put people and planet over plastic and profits, and I implore delegates to embrace this historic moment.